FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5M2210Z vs LCMXO3LF-2100

A comparison of the Altera MAX V 5M2210Z and the Lattice MachXO3 LCMXO3LF-2100 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5M2210ZLCMXO3LF-2100
Vendor / familyAltera MAX VLattice MachXO3
LUTs as published2,210 LUT42,100 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈2,210≈2,100
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure2,210 LE—
DSP— nones— 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM—0.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O271279
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process180 nm—
Configuration memoryInternal flash—
Packages28
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 2.2K and 2.1K LUT4 equivalents.

Configuration memory: internal flash on the 5M2210Z, — on the LCMXO3LF-2100.

The 5M2210Z is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LCMXO3LF-2100 with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5M2210Z (MAX V) and LCMXO3LF-2100 (MachXO3).