5M570Z vs LCMXO2-640U
A comparison of the Altera MAX V 5M570Z and the Lattice MachXO2 LCMXO2-640U using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| 5M570Z | LCMXO2-640U | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera MAX V | Lattice MachXO2 |
| LUTs as published | 570 LUT4 | 640 LUT4 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 4-input look-up table |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈570 | ≈640 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 570 LE | — |
| DSP | — nones | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | — | 0.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 159 | 107 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 180 nm | 65 nm |
| Configuration memory | Internal flash | Internal flash |
| Packages | 4 | 1 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | Lattice Diamond |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The LCMXO2-640U has about 12% more logic capacity (640 vs 570 LUT4 equivalents).
The 5M570Z is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LCMXO2-640U with Lattice Diamond.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5M570Z (MAX V) and LCMXO2-640U (MachXO2).