FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5M570Z vs LCMXO640C

A comparison of the Altera MAX V 5M570Z and the Lattice MachXO LCMXO640C using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5M570ZLCMXO640C
Vendor / familyAltera MAX VLattice MachXO
LUTs as published570 LUT4640 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈570≈640
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure570 LE—
DSP— nones— 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM——
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O159159
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process180 nm130 nm
Configuration memoryInternal flashInternal flash
Packages46
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The LCMXO640C has about 12% more logic capacity (640 vs 570 LUT4 equivalents).

The 5M570Z is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LCMXO640C with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5M570Z (MAX V) and LCMXO640C (MachXO).