5M80Z vs LCMXO256C
A comparison of the Altera MAX V 5M80Z and the Lattice MachXO LCMXO256C using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| 5M80Z | LCMXO256C | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera MAX V | Lattice MachXO |
| LUTs as published | 80 LUT4 | 256 LUT4 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 4-input look-up table |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈80 | ≈256 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 80 LE | — |
| DSP | — nones | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | — | — |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 79 | 78 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 180 nm | 130 nm |
| Configuration memory | Internal flash | Internal flash |
| Packages | 4 | 2 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | Lattice Diamond |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The LCMXO256C has about 220% more logic capacity (256 vs 80 LUT4 equivalents).
The 5M80Z is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LCMXO256C with Lattice Diamond.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5M80Z (MAX V) and LCMXO256C (MachXO).