5SEE9 vs LAV-AT-E50
A comparison of the Altera Stratix V 5SEE9 and the Lattice Avant-E LAV-AT-E50 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| 5SEE9 | LAV-AT-E50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Stratix V | Lattice Avant-E |
| LUTs as published | 317,000 ALMs | 255,000 LUT4 |
| LUT type | adaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions) | 4-input look-up table |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈634,000 | ≈255,000 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 840,000 LE | 409,000 LC |
| DSP | 352 variable-precision DSP blocks | 1,120 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 51.6 Mb | 22.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 840 | 553 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 2 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | Lattice Radiant |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The 5SEE9 has about 149% more logic capacity (634K vs 255K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the 5SEE9 is built from ALMs and the LAV-AT-E50 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (317K vs 255K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-E50 has 1,120 18×18 multipliers against 352 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5SEE9.
The 5SEE9 has more on-chip memory (51.6 Mb vs 22.7 Mb).
The 5SEE9 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LAV-AT-E50 with Lattice Radiant.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5SEE9 (Stratix V) and LAV-AT-E50 (Avant-E).