5SGSD3 vs XC6VHX250T
A comparison of the Altera Stratix V 5SGSD3 and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VHX250T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| 5SGSD3 | XC6VHX250T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Stratix V | AMD Virtex-6 |
| LUTs as published | 89,000 ALMs | 157,440 LUT6 |
| LUT type | adaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions) | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈178,000 | ≈251,904 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 236,000 LE | 251,904 LC |
| DSP | 600 variable-precision DSP blocks | 576 DSP48E1 slices |
| Block RAM | 13.4 Mb | 17.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 432 | 320 |
| Transceivers | 24 × GX 14.1 Gb/s | 48 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 | Gen2 x8 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 1 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | AMD ISE Design Suite |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XC6VHX250T has about 42% more logic capacity (252K vs 178K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the 5SGSD3 is built from ALMs and the XC6VHX250T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (89K vs 157K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the 5SGSD3 has 600 variable-precision DSP blocks against 576 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VHX250T.
The XC6VHX250T has more on-chip memory (17.7 Mb vs 13.4 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 14.1 Gb/s on the 5SGSD3 and 48 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VHX250T.
The 5SGSD3 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC6VHX250T with AMD ISE Design Suite.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5SGSD3 (Stratix V) and XC6VHX250T (Virtex-6).