FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5SGSD3 vs XC6VHX255T

A comparison of the Altera Stratix V 5SGSD3 and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VHX255T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5SGSD3XC6VHX255T
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix VAMD Virtex-6
LUTs as published89,000 ALMs158,400 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈178,000≈253,440
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure236,000 LE253,440 LC
DSP600 variable-precision DSP blocks576 DSP48E1 slices
Block RAM13.4 Mb18.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O432480
Transceivers24 × GX 14.1 Gb/s24 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s, 24 × GTH 11.18 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3Gen2 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm40 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC6VHX255T has about 42% more logic capacity (253K vs 178K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5SGSD3 is built from ALMs and the XC6VHX255T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (89K vs 158K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the 5SGSD3 has 600 variable-precision DSP blocks against 576 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VHX255T.

The XC6VHX255T has more on-chip memory (18.1 Mb vs 13.4 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 14.1 Gb/s on the 5SGSD3 and 48 at up to 11.18 Gb/s on the XC6VHX255T.

The 5SGSD3 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC6VHX255T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5SGSD3 (Stratix V) and XC6VHX255T (Virtex-6).