FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

5SGSD6 vs XC6VSX475T

A comparison of the Altera Stratix V 5SGSD6 and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VSX475T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

5SGSD6XC6VSX475T
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix VAMD Virtex-6
LUTs as published220,000 ALMs297,600 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈440,000≈476,160
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure583,000 LE476,160 LC
DSP1,775 variable-precision DSP blocks2,016 DSP48E1 slices
Block RAM45.3 Mb37.4 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O840840
Transceivers48 × GX 14.1 Gb/s36 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3Gen2 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm40 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC6VSX475T has about 8% more logic capacity (476K vs 440K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the 5SGSD6 is built from ALMs and the XC6VSX475T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (220K vs 298K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC6VSX475T has 2,016 DSP48E1 slices against 1,775 variable-precision DSP blocks on the 5SGSD6.

The 5SGSD6 has more on-chip memory (45.3 Mb vs 37.4 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 14.1 Gb/s on the 5SGSD6 and 36 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VSX475T.

The 5SGSD6 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC6VSX475T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: 5SGSD6 (Stratix V) and XC6VSX475T (Virtex-6).