FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A27F008 vs XCVC2602

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 27 A27F008 and the AMD Versal AI Core XCVC2602 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A27F008XCVC2602
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 27AMD Versal AI Core
LUTs as published274,190 ALMs375,000 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈548,380≈600,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure866,000 LE820,000 SLC
DSP1,096 AI Tensor DSP blocks984 DSP Engines
Block RAM40 Mb17 Mb
Large RAM63 Mb63 Mb
Max. user I/O312530
Transceivers16 × GX 128 Gb/s32 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen6 x8Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A720 + Cortex-A520 (optional)2× Arm Cortex-A72
Process—7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVC2602 has about 9% more logic capacity (600K vs 548K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A27F008 is built from ALMs and the XCVC2602 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (274K vs 375K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the A27F008 has 1,096 AI Tensor DSP blocks against 984 DSP Engines on the XCVC2602.

The A27F008 has more on-chip memory (103 Mb vs 80 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 128 Gb/s on the A27F008 and 32 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCVC2602.

The A27F008 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVC2602 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A27F008 (Agilex 27) and XCVC2602 (Versal AI Core).