FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A27F008 vs XCVP1002

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 27 A27F008 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1002 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A27F008XCVP1002
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 27AMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published274,190 ALMs380,800 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈548,380≈609,280
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure866,000 LE833,000 SLC
DSP1,096 AI Tensor DSP blocks1,140 DSP Engines
Block RAM40 Mb19 Mb
Large RAM63 Mb97 Mb
Max. user I/O312324
Transceivers16 × GX 128 Gb/s8 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s, 24 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen6 x8Gen4 x4, Gen4 x8
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A720 + Cortex-A520 (optional)2× Arm Cortex-A72
Process—7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVP1002 has about 11% more logic capacity (609K vs 548K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A27F008 is built from ALMs and the XCVP1002 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (274K vs 381K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCVP1002 has 1,140 DSP Engines against 1,096 AI Tensor DSP blocks on the A27F008.

The XCVP1002 has more on-chip memory (116 Mb vs 103 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 128 Gb/s on the A27F008 and 32 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVP1002.

The A27F008 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVP1002 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A27F008 (Agilex 27) and XCVP1002 (Versal Premium).