FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A27F031 vs XC2VP3502

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 27 A27F031 and the AMD Versal Premium Gen 2 XC2VP3502 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A27F031XC2VP3502
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 27AMD Versal Premium Gen 2
LUTs as published1,002,432 ALMs1,496,448 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈2,004,864≈2,394,317
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure3,100,000 LE3,273,480 SLC
DSP3,864 AI Tensor DSP blocks2,856 DSP Engines
Block RAM151 Mb99 Mb
Large RAM201 Mb182 Mb
Max. user I/O715736
Transceivers48 × GX 128 Gb/s72 × GTM2 112 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen6 x8Gen6 x8
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A720 + Cortex-A520 (optional)2× Arm Cortex-A72
Process——
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC2VP3502 has about 19% more logic capacity (2394K vs 2005K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A27F031 is built from ALMs and the XC2VP3502 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (1002K vs 1496K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the A27F031 has 3,864 AI Tensor DSP blocks against 2,856 DSP Engines on the XC2VP3502.

The A27F031 has more on-chip memory (352 Mb vs 281 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 128 Gb/s on the A27F031 and 72 at up to 112 Gb/s on the XC2VP3502.

The A27F031 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC2VP3502 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A27F031 (Agilex 27) and XC2VP3502 (Versal Premium Gen 2).