FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A27F054 vs XCVH1582

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 27 A27F054 and the AMD Versal HBM XCVH1582 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A27F054XCVH1582
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 27AMD Versal HBM
LUTs as published1,735,128 ALMs1,753,984 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈3,470,256≈2,806,374
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure5,400,000 LE3,837,000 SLC
DSP6,648 AI Tensor DSP blocks7,392 DSP Engines
Block RAM260 Mb89 Mb
Large RAM346 Mb366 Mb
Max. user I/O836702
Transceivers8 × GT 256 Gb/s, 48 × GX 128 Gb/s, 16 × GS 32 Gb/s68 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 20 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen7 x8Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A720 + Cortex-A520 (optional)2× Arm Cortex-A72
Process—7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The A27F054 has about 24% more logic capacity (3470K vs 2806K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A27F054 is built from ALMs and the XCVH1582 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (1735K vs 1754K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCVH1582 has 7,392 DSP Engines against 6,648 AI Tensor DSP blocks on the A27F054.

The A27F054 has more on-chip memory (606 Mb vs 455 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 72 at up to 256 Gb/s on the A27F054 and 88 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVH1582.

The A27F054 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVH1582 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A27F054 (Agilex 27) and XCVH1582 (Versal HBM).