FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A27F070 vs XCVH1742

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 27 A27F070 and the AMD Versal HBM XCVH1742 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A27F070XCVH1742
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 27AMD Versal HBM
LUTs as published2,265,648 ALMs2,574,208 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈4,531,296≈4,118,733
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure7,000,000 LE5,631,000 SLC
DSP8,316 AI Tensor DSP blocks10,848 DSP Engines
Block RAM325 Mb132 Mb
Large RAM433 Mb541 Mb
Max. user I/O934702
Transceivers80 × GX 128 Gb/s68 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 60 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen7 x8Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A720 + Cortex-A520 (optional)2× Arm Cortex-A72
Process—7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages31
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The A27F070 has about 10% more logic capacity (4531K vs 4119K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A27F070 is built from ALMs and the XCVH1742 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (2266K vs 2574K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCVH1742 has 10,848 DSP Engines against 8,316 AI Tensor DSP blocks on the A27F070.

The A27F070 has more on-chip memory (758 Mb vs 673 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 80 at up to 128 Gb/s on the A27F070 and 128 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVH1742.

The A27F070 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVH1742 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A27F070 (Agilex 27) and XCVH1742 (Versal HBM).