FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A27F100 vs XCVP1902

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 27 A27F100 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1902 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A27F100XCVP1902
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 27AMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published3,418,224 ALMs8,460,288 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈6,836,448≈13,536,461
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure10,600,000 LE18,507,000 SLC
DSP12,732 AI Tensor DSP blocks6,864 DSP Engines
Block RAM497 Mb239 Mb
Large RAM663 Mb619 Mb
Max. user I/O9862,416
Transceivers16 × GT 256 Gb/s, 96 × GX 128 Gb/s128 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 32 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen7 x8Gen5 x4
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A720 + Cortex-A520 (optional)2× Arm Cortex-A72
Process—7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVP1902 has about 98% more logic capacity (13536K vs 6836K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A27F100 is built from ALMs and the XCVP1902 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (3418K vs 8460K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the A27F100 has 12,732 AI Tensor DSP blocks against 6,864 DSP Engines on the XCVP1902.

The A27F100 has more on-chip memory (1160 Mb vs 858 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 112 at up to 256 Gb/s on the A27F100 and 160 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVP1902.

The A27F100 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVP1902 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A27F100 (Agilex 27) and XCVP1902 (Versal Premium).