FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A27F140 vs XCVP1902

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 27 A27F140 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1902 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A27F140XCVP1902
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 27AMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published4,531,296 ALMs8,460,288 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈9,062,592≈13,536,461
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure14,000,000 LE18,507,000 SLC
DSP16,632 AI Tensor DSP blocks6,864 DSP Engines
Block RAM650 Mb239 Mb
Large RAM866 Mb619 Mb
Max. user I/O1,8682,416
Transceivers160 × GX 128 Gb/s128 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 32 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen7 x8Gen5 x4
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A720 + Cortex-A520 (optional)2× Arm Cortex-A72
Process—7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages02
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVP1902 has about 49% more logic capacity (13536K vs 9063K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A27F140 is built from ALMs and the XCVP1902 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (4531K vs 8460K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the A27F140 has 16,632 AI Tensor DSP blocks against 6,864 DSP Engines on the XCVP1902.

The A27F140 has more on-chip memory (1516 Mb vs 858 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 160 at up to 128 Gb/s on the A27F140 and 160 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVP1902.

The A27F140 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVP1902 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A27F140 (Agilex 27) and XCVP1902 (Versal Premium).