FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A27F142 vs XCVP1802

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 27 A27F142 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP1802 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A27F142XCVP1802
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 27AMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published4,570,800 ALMs3,360,896 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈9,141,600≈5,377,434
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure14,200,000 LE7,352,000 SLC
DSP17,148 AI Tensor DSP blocks14,352 DSP Engines
Block RAM670 Mb174 Mb
Large RAM893 Mb717 Mb
Max. user I/O1,038702
Transceivers32 × GT 256 Gb/s, 112 × GX 128 Gb/s28 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 140 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen7 x8Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A720 + Cortex-A520 (optional)2× Arm Cortex-A72
Process—7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages02
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The A27F142 has about 70% more logic capacity (9142K vs 5377K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A27F142 is built from ALMs and the XCVP1802 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (4571K vs 3361K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the A27F142 has 17,148 AI Tensor DSP blocks against 14,352 DSP Engines on the XCVP1802.

The A27F142 has more on-chip memory (1563 Mb vs 891 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 144 at up to 256 Gb/s on the A27F142 and 168 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVP1802.

The A27F142 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVP1802 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A27F142 (Agilex 27) and XCVP1802 (Versal Premium).