FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A27F180 vs XCVP2802

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 27 A27F180 and the AMD Versal Premium XCVP2802 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A27F180XCVP2802
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 27AMD Versal Premium
LUTs as published5,683,872 ALMs3,349,120 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈11,367,744≈5,358,592
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure17,600,000 LE7,326,000 SLC
DSP21,048 AI Tensor DSP blocks14,304 DSP Engines
Block RAM822 Mb174 Mb
Large RAM1096 Mb717 Mb
Max. user I/O1,920702
Transceivers16 × GT 256 Gb/s, 176 × GX 128 Gb/s28 × GTYP 32.75 Gb/s, 140 × GTM 58 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen7 x8Gen5 x8, Gen5 x4
Hard processor4× Arm Cortex-A720 + Cortex-A520 (optional)2× Arm Cortex-A72
Process—7 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages01
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The A27F180 has about 112% more logic capacity (11368K vs 5359K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A27F180 is built from ALMs and the XCVP2802 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (5684K vs 3349K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the A27F180 has 21,048 AI Tensor DSP blocks against 14,304 DSP Engines on the XCVP2802.

The A27F180 has more on-chip memory (1918 Mb vs 891 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 192 at up to 256 Gb/s on the A27F180 and 168 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVP2802.

The A27F180 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVP2802 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A27F180 (Agilex 27) and XCVP2802 (Versal Premium).