FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

A3C 025 vs GW5AS-25

A comparison of the Altera Agilex 3 A3C 025 and the Gowin Arora V GW5AS-25 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

A3C 025GW5AS-25
Vendor / familyAltera Agilex 3Gowin Arora V
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)17,00023,040
LUTs as published8,500 ALMs23,040 LUT4
Vendor logic figure25,075 LE— LC
DSP34 variable-precision DSP blocks28 27×18 DSP blocks
Block RAM1.3 Mb1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O256239
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processor2× Arm Cortex-A55 (optional)1× Cortex-M4
ProcessIntel 722 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages33
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeGowin EDA

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW5AS-25 has about 36% more logic capacity (23K vs 17K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the A3C 025 is built from ALMs and the GW5AS-25 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (8.5K vs 23K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the A3C 025 has 34 variable-precision DSP blocks against 28 27×18 DSP blocks on the GW5AS-25.

The A3C 025 has more on-chip memory (1.3 Mb vs 1 Mb).

The A3C 025 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the GW5AS-25 with Gowin EDA.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: A3C 025 (Agilex 3) and GW5AS-25 (Arora V).