FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

AC7t1500 vs XCVU31P

A comparison of the Achronix Speedster7t AC7t1500 and the AMD Virtex UltraScale+ HBM XCVU31P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

AC7t1500XCVU31P
Vendor / familyAchronix Speedster7tAMD Virtex UltraScale+ HBM
LUTs as published692,000 LUT6440,000 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,107,200≈704,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure1,546,000 LC962,000 SLC
DSP2,560 MLPs2,880 DSP slices
Block RAM184.2 Mb23.6 Mb
Large RAM—90 Mb
Max. user I/O—208
Transceivers32 × SerDes 112 Gb/s32 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen5 x8, Gen5 x16Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process7 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages00
Design toolAchronix Tool SuiteAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The AC7t1500 has about 57% more logic capacity (1107K vs 704K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XCVU31P has 2,880 DSP slices against 2,560 MLPs on the AC7t1500.

The AC7t1500 has more on-chip memory (184.2 Mb vs 113.6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 32 at up to 112 Gb/s on the AC7t1500 and 32 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCVU31P.

The AC7t1500 is designed with Achronix Tool Suite and the XCVU31P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: AC7t1500 (Speedster7t) and XCVU31P (Virtex UltraScale+ HBM).