CCGM1A2 vs EP4CGX15
A comparison of the Cologne Chip GateMate CCGM1A2 and the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX15 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| CCGM1A2 | EP4CGX15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Cologne Chip GateMate | Altera Cyclone IV |
| LUTs as published | 40,960 CPEs | 14,000 LUT4 |
| LUT type | Cologne Chip programmable element: 8-input LUT tree, or two 4-input LUT trees | 4-input look-up table |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈81,920 | ≈14,000 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | — | 14,000 LE |
| DSP | — DSP blocks | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 2.5 Mb | 0.5 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 162 | 72 |
| Transceivers | 2 × SerDes 5 Gb/s | 2 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | None | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 60 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 1 | 1 |
| Design tool | Yosys + nextpnr (open source) | Altera Quartus Prime |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The CCGM1A2 has about 485% more logic capacity (81.9K vs 14K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the CCGM1A2 is built from CPEs and the EP4CGX15 from LUT4, so the raw LUT counts (41K vs 14K) are not directly comparable.
The CCGM1A2 has more on-chip memory (2.5 Mb vs 0.5 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 2 at up to 5 Gb/s on the CCGM1A2 and 2 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the EP4CGX15.
The CCGM1A2 is designed with Yosys + nextpnr (open source) and the EP4CGX15 with Altera Quartus Prime.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: CCGM1A2 (GateMate) and EP4CGX15 (Cyclone IV).