FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Certus-N2 CT16 vs Mach-N2 MH16

A comparison of the Lattice Certus-N2 Certus-N2 CT16 and the Lattice Mach-N2 Mach-N2 MH16 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Certus-N2 CT16Mach-N2 MH16
Vendor / familyLattice Certus-N2Lattice Mach-N2
LUTs as published98,000 LUT498,000 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈98,000≈98,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure160,000 LC160,000 LC
DSP360 18×18 multipliers360 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM8 Mb8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O298248
Transceivers8 × SERDES 16 Gb/s4 × SERDES 16 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMInternal flash
Packages41
Design toolLattice RadiantLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 98K and 98K LUT4 equivalents.

Configuration memory: sram on the Certus-N2 CT16, internal flash on the Mach-N2 MH16.

The Certus-N2 CT16 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the Mach-N2 MH16 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Certus-N2 CT16 (Certus-N2) and Mach-N2 MH16 (Mach-N2).