FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

DX 2100 vs MX 2100

A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 DX DX 2100 and the Altera Stratix 10 MX MX 2100 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

DX 2100MX 2100
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix 10 DXAltera Stratix 10 MX
LUTs as published702,720 ALMs702,720 ALMs
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)adaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,405,440≈1,405,440
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure2,073,000 LE2,073,000 LE
DSP3,960 variable-precision DSP blocks3,960 variable-precision DSP blocks
Block RAM134 Mb134 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O612656
Transceivers60 × GXP 16 Gb/s, 24 × GXE 57.8 Gb/s64 × GXT 28.3 Gb/s, 32 × GX 17.4 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x16Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process14 nm14 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages11
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAltera Quartus Prime

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 1405K and 1405K LUT4 equivalents.

Both have transceivers: 84 at up to 57.8 Gb/s on the DX 2100 and 96 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the MX 2100.

The DX 2100 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the MX 2100 with Altera Quartus Prime.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: DX 2100 (Stratix 10 DX) and MX 2100 (Stratix 10 MX).