FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CE6 vs LFXP2-5E

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CE6 and the Lattice LatticeXP2 LFXP2-5E using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CE6LFXP2-5E
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVLattice LatticeXP2
LUTs as published6,000 LUT45,000 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈6,000≈5,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure6,000 LE—
DSP15 18×18 multipliers12 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.3 Mb0.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O179172
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm90 nm
Configuration memorySRAMInternal flash
Packages34
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The EP4CE6 has about 20% more logic capacity (6K vs 5K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the EP4CE6 has 15 18×18 multipliers against 12 18×18 multipliers on the LFXP2-5E.

The EP4CE6 has more on-chip memory (0.3 Mb vs 0.2 Mb).

Configuration memory: sram on the EP4CE6, internal flash on the LFXP2-5E.

The EP4CE6 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LFXP2-5E with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CE6 (Cyclone IV) and LFXP2-5E (LatticeXP2).