FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CE6 vs LFXP2-8E

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CE6 and the Lattice LatticeXP2 LFXP2-8E using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CE6LFXP2-8E
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVLattice LatticeXP2
LUTs as published6,000 LUT48,000 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈6,000≈8,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure6,000 LE—
DSP15 18×18 multipliers16 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.3 Mb0.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O179201
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm90 nm
Configuration memorySRAMInternal flash
Packages34
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The LFXP2-8E has about 33% more logic capacity (8K vs 6K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the LFXP2-8E has 16 18×18 multipliers against 15 18×18 multipliers on the EP4CE6.

The EP4CE6 has more on-chip memory (0.3 Mb vs 0.2 Mb).

Configuration memory: sram on the EP4CE6, internal flash on the LFXP2-8E.

The EP4CE6 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LFXP2-8E with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CE6 (Cyclone IV) and LFXP2-8E (LatticeXP2).