FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CGX150 vs LFE3-150EA

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX150 and the Lattice LatticeECP3 LFE3-150EA using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CGX150LFE3-150EA
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVLattice LatticeECP3
LUTs as published150,000 LUT4149,000 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈150,000≈149,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure150,000 LE—
DSP360 18×18 multipliers320 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM6.3 Mb6.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O475586
Transceivers8 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s16 × SERDES 3.2 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm65 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 150K and 149K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the EP4CGX150 has 360 18×18 multipliers against 320 18×18 multipliers on the LFE3-150EA.

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the EP4CGX150 and 16 at up to 3.2 Gb/s on the LFE3-150EA.

The EP4CGX150 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LFE3-150EA with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CGX150 (Cyclone IV) and LFE3-150EA (LatticeECP3).