FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4CGX30 vs LFE3-35EA

A comparison of the Altera Cyclone IV EP4CGX30 and the Lattice LatticeECP3 LFE3-35EA using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4CGX30LFE3-35EA
Vendor / familyAltera Cyclone IVLattice LatticeECP3
LUTs as published29,000 LUT433,000 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈29,000≈33,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure29,000 LE—
DSP80 18×18 multipliers64 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM1.1 Mb1.3 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O290310
Transceivers4 × XCVR 3.125 Gb/s4 × SERDES 3.2 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process60 nm65 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages33
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeLattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The LFE3-35EA has about 14% more logic capacity (33K vs 29K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the EP4CGX30 has 80 18×18 multipliers against 64 18×18 multipliers on the LFE3-35EA.

The LFE3-35EA has more on-chip memory (1.3 Mb vs 1.1 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 4 at up to 3.125 Gb/s on the EP4CGX30 and 4 at up to 3.2 Gb/s on the LFE3-35EA.

The EP4CGX30 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the LFE3-35EA with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4CGX30 (Cyclone IV) and LFE3-35EA (LatticeECP3).