FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

EP4SGX290 vs XC6VHX255T

A comparison of the Altera Stratix IV EP4SGX290 and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VHX255T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

EP4SGX290XC6VHX255T
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix IVAMD Virtex-6
LUTs as published116,480 ALMs158,400 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈232,960≈253,440
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure291,000 LE253,440 LC
DSP832 18×18 multipliers576 DSP48E1 slices
Block RAM13.3 Mb18.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O904480
Transceivers32 × XCVR 8.5 Gb/s, 16 × XCVR 6.5 Gb/s24 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s, 24 × GTH 11.18 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2Gen2 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process40 nm40 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages52
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC6VHX255T has about 9% more logic capacity (253K vs 233K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the EP4SGX290 is built from ALMs and the XC6VHX255T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (116K vs 158K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the EP4SGX290 has 832 18×18 multipliers against 576 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VHX255T.

The XC6VHX255T has more on-chip memory (18.1 Mb vs 13.3 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 48 at up to 8.5 Gb/s on the EP4SGX290 and 48 at up to 11.18 Gb/s on the XC6VHX255T.

The EP4SGX290 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XC6VHX255T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: EP4SGX290 (Stratix IV) and XC6VHX255T (Virtex-6).