FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW5AT-15 vs LFE3-17EA

A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-15 and the Lattice LatticeECP3 LFE3-17EA using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW5AT-15LFE3-17EA
Vendor / familyGowin Arora VLattice LatticeECP3
LUTs as published15,120 LUT417,000 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈15,120≈17,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure——
DSP28 27×18 DSP blocks24 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.6 Mb0.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O53222
Transceivers4 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s4 × SERDES 3.2 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x4None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process22 nm65 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages23
Design toolGowin EDALattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The LFE3-17EA has about 12% more logic capacity (17K vs 15.1K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GW5AT-15 has 28 27×18 DSP blocks against 24 18×18 multipliers on the LFE3-17EA.

Both have transceivers: 4 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-15 and 4 at up to 3.2 Gb/s on the LFE3-17EA.

The GW5AT-15 is designed with Gowin EDA and the LFE3-17EA with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AT-15 (Arora V) and LFE3-17EA (LatticeECP3).