GW5AT-75 vs XC6VLX75T
A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-75 and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VLX75T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW5AT-75 | XC6VLX75T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora V | AMD Virtex-6 |
| LUTs as published | 86,688 LUT4 | 46,560 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈86,688 | ≈74,496 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | — | 74,496 LC |
| DSP | 213 27×18 DSP blocks | 288 DSP48E1 slices |
| Block RAM | 4.5 Mb | 5.5 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 312 | 360 |
| Transceivers | 8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 12 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x8 | Gen2 x8 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 0 | 2 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | AMD ISE Design Suite |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The GW5AT-75 has about 16% more logic capacity (86.7K vs 74.5K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the GW5AT-75 is built from LUT4 and the XC6VLX75T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (86.7K vs 46.6K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC6VLX75T has 288 DSP48E1 slices against 213 27×18 DSP blocks on the GW5AT-75.
The XC6VLX75T has more on-chip memory (5.5 Mb vs 4.5 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-75 and 12 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VLX75T.
The GW5AT-75 is designed with Gowin EDA and the XC6VLX75T with AMD ISE Design Suite.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AT-75 (Arora V) and XC6VLX75T (Virtex-6).