FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GX 1650 vs XCVU160

A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX GX 1650 and the AMD Virtex UltraScale XCVU160 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GX 1650XCVU160
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix 10 GX/SXAMD Virtex UltraScale
LUTs as published550,540 ALMs926,400 LUT6
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,101,080≈1,482,240
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure1,624,000 LE2,027,000 SLC
DSP3,145 variable-precision DSP blocks1,560 DSP slices
Block RAM114 Mb115.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O704702
Transceivers64 × XCVR 28.3 Gb/s, 32 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s52 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 52 × GTY 30.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x16Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process14 nm20 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XCVU160 has about 35% more logic capacity (1482K vs 1101K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the GX 1650 is built from ALMs and the XCVU160 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (551K vs 926K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the GX 1650 has 3,145 variable-precision DSP blocks against 1,560 DSP slices on the XCVU160.

Both have transceivers: 96 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the GX 1650 and 104 at up to 30.5 Gb/s on the XCVU160.

The GX 1650 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVU160 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GX 1650 (Stratix 10 GX/SX) and XCVU160 (Virtex UltraScale).