FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GX 2500 vs MX 2100

A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX GX 2500 and the Altera Stratix 10 MX MX 2100 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GX 2500MX 2100
Vendor / familyAltera Stratix 10 GX/SXAltera Stratix 10 MX
LUTs as published821,150 ALMs702,720 ALMs
LUT typeadaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)adaptive logic module: fracturable 8-input LUT (one 6-input or two independent 4-input functions)
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,642,300≈1,405,440
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure2,422,000 LE2,073,000 LE
DSP5,011 variable-precision DSP blocks3,960 variable-precision DSP blocks
Block RAM195 Mb134 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O1,160656
Transceivers64 × XCVR 28.3 Gb/s, 32 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s64 × GXT 28.3 Gb/s, 32 × GX 17.4 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x16Gen3 x16
Hard processorNoneNone
Process14 nm14 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages31
Design toolAltera Quartus PrimeAltera Quartus Prime

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The GX 2500 has about 17% more logic capacity (1642K vs 1405K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the GX 2500 has 5,011 variable-precision DSP blocks against 3,960 variable-precision DSP blocks on the MX 2100.

The GX 2500 has more on-chip memory (195 Mb vs 134 Mb).

The GX 2500 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the MX 2100 with Altera Quartus Prime.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GX 2500 (Stratix 10 GX/SX) and MX 2100 (Stratix 10 MX).