LAV-AT-G70 vs RTPF500T
A comparison of the Lattice Avant-G LAV-AT-G70 and the Microchip RT PolarFire RTPF500T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LAV-AT-G70 | RTPF500T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice Avant-G | Microchip RT PolarFire |
| LUTs as published | 397,000 LUT4 | 481,000 LUT4 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 4-input look-up table |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈397,000 | ≈481,000 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 637,000 LC | 481,000 LE |
| DSP | 1,800 18×18 multipliers | 1,480 18×18 math blocks |
| Block RAM | 35.6 Mb | 29.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 554 | 632 |
| Transceivers | 28 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 24 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | None | Gen2 x4 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | Non-volatile (SONOS flash) |
| Packages | 3 | 2 |
| Design tool | Lattice Radiant | Microchip Libero SoC |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The RTPF500T has about 21% more logic capacity (481K vs 397K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-G70 has 1,800 18×18 multipliers against 1,480 18×18 math blocks on the RTPF500T.
The LAV-AT-G70 has more on-chip memory (35.6 Mb vs 29.7 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 28 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-G70 and 24 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the RTPF500T.
Configuration memory: sram on the LAV-AT-G70, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the RTPF500T.
The LAV-AT-G70 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the RTPF500T with Microchip Libero SoC.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-G70 (Avant-G) and RTPF500T (RT PolarFire).