FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LCMXO1200E vs LCMXO3L-1300

A comparison of the Lattice MachXO LCMXO1200E and the Lattice MachXO3 LCMXO3L-1300 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LCMXO1200ELCMXO3L-1300
Vendor / familyLattice MachXOLattice MachXO3
LUTs as published1,200 LUT41,300 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈1,200≈1,300
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure——
DSP— 18×18 multipliers— 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0 Mb0.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O211206
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process130 nm—
Configuration memoryInternal flash—
Packages56
Design toolLattice DiamondLattice Diamond

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The LCMXO3L-1300 has about 8% more logic capacity (1.3K vs 1.2K LUT4 equivalents).

The LCMXO3L-1300 has more on-chip memory (0.1 Mb vs 0 Mb).

Configuration memory: internal flash on the LCMXO1200E, — on the LCMXO3L-1300.

The LCMXO1200E is designed with Lattice Diamond and the LCMXO3L-1300 with Lattice Diamond.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LCMXO1200E (MachXO) and LCMXO3L-1300 (MachXO3).