LCMXO3L-640 vs LCMXO640C
A comparison of the Lattice MachXO3 LCMXO3L-640 and the Lattice MachXO LCMXO640C using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LCMXO3L-640 | LCMXO640C | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice MachXO3 | Lattice MachXO |
| LUTs as published | 640 LUT4 | 640 LUT4 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 4-input look-up table |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈640 | ≈640 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | — | — |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.1 Mb | — |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 104 | 159 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | — | 130 nm |
| Configuration memory | — | Internal flash |
| Packages | 3 | 6 |
| Design tool | Lattice Diamond | Lattice Diamond |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 640 and 640 LUT4 equivalents.
Configuration memory: — on the LCMXO3L-640, internal flash on the LCMXO640C.
The LCMXO3L-640 is designed with Lattice Diamond and the LCMXO640C with Lattice Diamond.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LCMXO3L-640 (MachXO3) and LCMXO640C (MachXO).