LFCPNX-50 vs Mach-N2 MH06
A comparison of the Lattice CertusPro-NX LFCPNX-50 and the Lattice Mach-N2 Mach-N2 MH06 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LFCPNX-50 | Mach-N2 MH06 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice CertusPro-NX | Lattice Mach-N2 |
| LUTs as published | 43,333 LUT4 | 40,000 LUT4 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 4-input look-up table |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈43,333 | ≈40,000 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 52,000 LC | 65,000 LC |
| DSP | 96 18×18 multipliers | 120 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 1.7 Mb | 4 Mb |
| Large RAM | 2 Mb | — |
| Max. user I/O | 269 | 196 |
| Transceivers | 4 × SERDES 10.3125 Gb/s | 4 × SERDES 16 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | Internal flash |
| Packages | 4 | 2 |
| Design tool | Lattice Radiant | Lattice Radiant |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The LFCPNX-50 has about 8% more logic capacity (43.3K vs 40K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the Mach-N2 MH06 has 120 18×18 multipliers against 96 18×18 multipliers on the LFCPNX-50.
Both have transceivers: 4 at up to 10.3125 Gb/s on the LFCPNX-50 and 4 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Mach-N2 MH06.
Configuration memory: sram on the LFCPNX-50, internal flash on the Mach-N2 MH06.
The LFCPNX-50 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the Mach-N2 MH06 with Lattice Radiant.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFCPNX-50 (CertusPro-NX) and Mach-N2 MH06 (Mach-N2).