FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LFXP2-17E vs T13

A comparison of the Lattice LatticeXP2 LFXP2-17E and the Efinix Trion T13 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LFXP2-17ET13
Vendor / familyLattice LatticeXP2Efinix Trion
LUTs as published17,000 LUT4Not published
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈17,000≈12,828
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure—12,828 LE
DSP20 18×18 multipliers24 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.3 Mb0.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O358195
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process90 nm40 nm
Configuration memoryInternal flashSRAM
Packages33
Design toolLattice DiamondEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The LFXP2-17E has about 33% more logic capacity (17K vs 12.8K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the T13 has 24 18×18 multipliers against 20 18×18 multipliers on the LFXP2-17E.

The T13 has more on-chip memory (0.7 Mb vs 0.3 Mb).

Configuration memory: internal flash on the LFXP2-17E, sram on the T13.

The LFXP2-17E is designed with Lattice Diamond and the T13 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFXP2-17E (LatticeXP2) and T13 (Trion).