FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPF300T vs XC6VLX365T

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire MPF300T and the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VLX365T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPF300TXC6VLX365T
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFireAMD Virtex-6
LUTs as published300,000 LUT4227,520 LUT6
LUT type4-input look-up table6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈300,000≈364,032
CoreScore (SERV cores)882—
Vendor logic figure300,000 LE364,032 LC
DSP924 18×18 math blocks (MACC)576 DSP48E1 slices
Block RAM18.6 Mb14.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O512720
Transceivers16 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s24 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen2 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm40 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)SRAM
Packages52
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCAMD ISE Design Suite

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

The XC6VLX365T has about 21% more logic capacity (364K vs 300K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the MPF300T is built from LUT4 and the XC6VLX365T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (300K vs 228K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the MPF300T has 924 18×18 math blocks (MACC) against 576 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VLX365T.

The MPF300T has more on-chip memory (18.6 Mb vs 14.6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF300T and 24 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VLX365T.

Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF300T, sram on the XC6VLX365T.

The MPF300T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the XC6VLX365T with AMD ISE Design Suite.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPF300T (PolarFire) and XC6VLX365T (Virtex-6).