FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPF500T vs RTPF500ZT

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire MPF500T and the Microchip RT PolarFire RTPF500ZT using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPF500TRTPF500ZT
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFireMicrochip RT PolarFire
LUTs as published481,000 LUT4481,000 LUT4
LUT type4-input look-up table4-input look-up table
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈481,000≈481,000
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure481,000 LE481,000 LE
DSP1,480 18×18 math blocks (MACC)1,480 18×18 math blocks
Block RAM29.7 Mb29.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O584632
Transceivers24 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s24 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen2 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)Non-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages23
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 481K and 481K LUT4 equivalents.

The MPF500T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the RTPF500ZT with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPF500T (PolarFire) and RTPF500ZT (RT PolarFire).