MPFS160T vs Ti135
A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire SoC MPFS160T and the Efinix Titanium Ti135 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| MPFS160T | Ti135 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Microchip PolarFire SoC | Efinix Titanium |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 161,000 | 129,600 |
| LUTs as published | 161,000 LUT4 | 129,600 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | 161,000 LE | 132,192 LE |
| DSP | 498 18×18 math blocks (MACC) | 480 DSP blocks |
| Block RAM | 10.2 Mb | 9.8 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 312 | 223 |
| Transceivers | 8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 8 × SERDES 16 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 x4 | Gen4 x4 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V (RV64GC U54) | 4× RISC-V RV32 |
| Process | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | Non-volatile (SONOS flash) | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 4 |
| Design tool | Microchip Libero SoC | Efinix Efinity |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The MPFS160T has about 24% more logic capacity (161K vs 130K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the MPFS160T has 498 18×18 math blocks (MACC) against 480 DSP blocks on the Ti135.
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the MPFS160T and 8 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti135.
Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPFS160T, sram on the Ti135.
The MPFS160T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the Ti135 with Efinix Efinity.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPFS160T (PolarFire SoC) and Ti135 (Titanium).