FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPFS460T vs XC7Z100

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire SoC MPFS460T and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z100 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPFS460TXC7Z100
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFire SoCAMD Zynq 7000
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)461,000443,840
LUTs as published461,000 LUT4277,400 LUT6
Vendor logic figure461,000 LE444,000 LC
DSP1,420 18×18 math blocks (MACC)2,020 DSP slices
Block RAM28.5 Mb26.5 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O468400
Transceivers20 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen2 x8
Hard processor4× RISC-V (RV64GC U54)2× Arm Cortex-A9
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)SRAM
Packages12
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 461K and 444K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the MPFS460T is built from LUT4 and the XC7Z100 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (461K vs 277K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7Z100 has 2,020 DSP slices against 1,420 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPFS460T.

Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPFS460T, sram on the XC7Z100.

The MPFS460T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the XC7Z100 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPFS460T (PolarFire SoC) and XC7Z100 (Zynq 7000).