RTPF500T vs XC7K410T
A comparison of the Microchip RT PolarFire RTPF500T and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K410T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| RTPF500T | XC7K410T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Microchip RT PolarFire | AMD Kintex-7 |
| LUTs as published | 481,000 LUT4 | 254,200 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 4-input look-up table | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈481,000 | ≈406,720 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 481,000 LE | 406,720 LC |
| DSP | 1,480 18×18 math blocks | 1,540 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 29.7 Mb | 27.9 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 632 | 500 |
| Transceivers | 24 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s | 16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 x4 | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | Non-volatile (SONOS flash) | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 4 |
| Design tool | Microchip Libero SoC | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The RTPF500T has about 18% more logic capacity (481K vs 407K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the RTPF500T is built from LUT4 and the XC7K410T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (481K vs 254K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC7K410T has 1,540 DSP slices against 1,480 18×18 math blocks on the RTPF500T.
Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the RTPF500T and 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K410T.
Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the RTPF500T, sram on the XC7K410T.
The RTPF500T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the XC7K410T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: RTPF500T (RT PolarFire) and XC7K410T (Kintex-7).