XC6VLX365T vs XC7K325T
A comparison of the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VLX365T and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K325T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC6VLX365T | XC7K325T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Virtex-6 | AMD Kintex-7 |
| LUTs as published | 227,520 LUT6 | 203,800 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈364,032 | ≈326,080 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | 967 |
| Vendor logic figure | 364,032 LC | 326,080 LC |
| DSP | 576 DSP48E1 slices | 840 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 14.6 Mb | 15.6 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 720 | 500 |
| Transceivers | 24 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s | 16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 x8 | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 4 |
| Design tool | AMD ISE Design Suite | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XC6VLX365T has about 12% more logic capacity (364K vs 326K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XC7K325T has 840 DSP slices against 576 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VLX365T.
Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VLX365T and 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K325T.
The XC6VLX365T is designed with AMD ISE Design Suite and the XC7K325T with AMD Vivado; open source: openXC7 (experimental) with Project X-Ray.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC6VLX365T (Virtex-6) and XC7K325T (Kintex-7).