XC6VSX315T vs XC7VX330T
A comparison of the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VSX315T and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX330T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC6VSX315T | XC7VX330T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Virtex-6 | AMD Virtex-7 |
| LUTs as published | 196,800 LUT6 | 204,000 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈314,880 | ≈326,400 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 314,880 LC | 326,400 LC |
| DSP | 1,344 DSP48E1 slices | 1,120 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 24.8 Mb | 26.4 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 720 | 700 |
| Transceivers | 24 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s | 28 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 x8 | Gen3 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD ISE Design Suite | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 315K and 326K LUT4 equivalents.
For arithmetic, the XC6VSX315T has 1,344 DSP48E1 slices against 1,120 DSP slices on the XC7VX330T.
Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VSX315T and 28 at up to 13.1 Gb/s on the XC7VX330T.
The XC6VSX315T is designed with AMD ISE Design Suite and the XC7VX330T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC6VSX315T (Virtex-6) and XC7VX330T (Virtex-7).