XC6VSX475T vs XCKU060
A comparison of the AMD Virtex-6 XC6VSX475T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU060 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC6VSX475T | XCKU060 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Virtex-6 | AMD Kintex UltraScale |
| LUTs as published | 297,600 LUT6 | 331,680 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈476,160 | ≈530,688 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 476,160 LC | 726,000 SLC |
| DSP | 2,016 DSP48E1 slices | 2,760 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 37.4 Mb | 38 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 840 | 624 |
| Transceivers | 36 × GTX 6.6 Gb/s | 32 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 x8 | Gen3 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 40 nm | 20 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD ISE Design Suite | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCKU060 has about 11% more logic capacity (531K vs 476K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCKU060 has 2,760 DSP slices against 2,016 DSP48E1 slices on the XC6VSX475T.
Both have transceivers: 36 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC6VSX475T and 32 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU060.
The XC6VSX475T is designed with AMD ISE Design Suite and the XCKU060 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC6VSX475T (Virtex-6) and XCKU060 (Kintex UltraScale).