XC7A200T vs XCKU025
A comparison of the AMD Artix-7 XC7A200T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU025 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC7A200T | XCKU025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Artix-7 | AMD Kintex UltraScale |
| LUTs as published | 134,600 LUT6 | 145,440 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈215,360 | ≈232,704 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | 652 | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 215,360 LC | 318,000 SLC |
| DSP | 740 DSP slices | 1,152 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 12.8 Mb | 12.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 500 | 312 |
| Transceivers | 16 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s | 12 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 | Gen3 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 20 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 1 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCKU025 has about 8% more logic capacity (233K vs 215K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCKU025 has 1,152 DSP slices against 740 DSP slices on the XC7A200T.
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A200T and 12 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU025.
The XC7A200T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU025 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7A200T (Artix-7) and XCKU025 (Kintex UltraScale).