XC7K410T vs XCKU040
A comparison of the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K410T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU040 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC7K410T | XCKU040 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Kintex-7 | AMD Kintex UltraScale |
| LUTs as published | 254,200 LUT6 | 242,400 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈406,720 | ≈387,840 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | 1,024 |
| Vendor logic figure | 406,720 LC | 530,000 SLC |
| DSP | 1,540 DSP slices | 1,920 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 27.9 Mb | 21.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 500 | 520 |
| Transceivers | 16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s | 20 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 | Gen3 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 20 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 4 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 407K and 388K LUT4 equivalents.
For arithmetic, the XCKU040 has 1,920 DSP slices against 1,540 DSP slices on the XC7K410T.
The XC7K410T has more on-chip memory (27.9 Mb vs 21.1 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K410T and 20 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU040.
The XC7K410T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU040 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7K410T (Kintex-7) and XCKU040 (Kintex UltraScale).