XC7VX485T vs XCKU060
A comparison of the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX485T and the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU060 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XC7VX485T | XCKU060 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Virtex-7 | AMD Kintex UltraScale |
| LUTs as published | 303,600 LUT6 | 331,680 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈485,760 | ≈530,688 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 485,760 LC | 726,000 SLC |
| DSP | 2,800 DSP slices | 2,760 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 36.2 Mb | 38 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 700 | 624 |
| Transceivers | 56 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s | 32 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen2 | Gen3 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 20 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 5 | 2 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCKU060 has about 9% more logic capacity (531K vs 486K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XC7VX485T has 2,800 DSP slices against 2,760 DSP slices on the XCKU060.
Both have transceivers: 56 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7VX485T and 32 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU060.
The XC7VX485T is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU060 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC7VX485T (Virtex-7) and XCKU060 (Kintex UltraScale).