XCKU060 vs XCKU11P
A comparison of the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU060 and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU11P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| XCKU060 | XCKU11P | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | AMD Kintex UltraScale | AMD Kintex UltraScale+ |
| LUTs as published | 331,680 LUT6 | 299,000 LUT6 |
| LUT type | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs | 6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs |
| LUT4 equivalent (approx.) | ≈530,688 | ≈478,400 |
| CoreScore (SERV cores) | — | — |
| Vendor logic figure | 726,000 SLC | 653,000 SLC |
| DSP | 2,760 DSP slices | 2,928 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 38 Mb | 21.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 22.5 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 624 | 512 |
| Transceivers | 32 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s | 32 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 20 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 | Gen3 x16 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 20 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 3 |
| Design tool | AMD Vivado | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.
Key differences
The XCKU060 has about 11% more logic capacity (531K vs 478K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the XCKU11P has 2,928 DSP slices against 2,760 DSP slices on the XCKU060.
The XCKU11P has more on-chip memory (43.6 Mb vs 38 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 32 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU060 and 52 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCKU11P.
The XCKU060 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU11P with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCKU060 (Kintex UltraScale) and XCKU11P (Kintex UltraScale+).