FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XCKU060 vs XCKU13P

A comparison of the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU060 and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU13P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XCKU060XCKU13P
Vendor / familyAMD Kintex UltraScaleAMD Kintex UltraScale+
LUTs as published331,680 LUT6341,000 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈530,688≈545,600
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure726,000 SLC747,000 SLC
DSP2,760 DSP slices3,528 DSP slices
Block RAM38 Mb26.2 Mb
Large RAM—31.5 Mb
Max. user I/O624304
Transceivers32 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s28 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages21
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 531K and 546K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the XCKU13P has 3,528 DSP slices against 2,760 DSP slices on the XCKU060.

The XCKU13P has more on-chip memory (57.7 Mb vs 38 Mb).

The XCKU060 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCKU13P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCKU060 (Kintex UltraScale) and XCKU13P (Kintex UltraScale+).