FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XCKU095 vs XCVU095

A comparison of the AMD Kintex UltraScale XCKU095 and the AMD Virtex UltraScale XCVU095 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XCKU095XCVU095
Vendor / familyAMD Kintex UltraScaleAMD Virtex UltraScale
LUTs as published537,600 LUT6537,600 LUT6
LUT type6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs6-input look-up table, fracturable into two LUT5 with shared inputs
LUT4 equivalent (approx.)≈860,160≈860,160
CoreScore (SERV cores)——
Vendor logic figure1,176,000 SLC1,176,000 SLC
DSP768 DSP slices768 DSP slices
Block RAM59.1 Mb60.8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O702832
Transceivers64 × GTH/GTY 16.3 Gb/s32 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 32 × GTY 30.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process20 nm20 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages46
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. LUT counts are shown as published; the LUT4 equivalent is an approximation to compare different LUT types, see how FPGA vendors count logic. Add up to two more devices to this comparison.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 860K and 860K LUT4 equivalents.

Both have transceivers: 64 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCKU095 and 64 at up to 30.5 Gb/s on the XCVU095.

The XCKU095 is designed with AMD Vivado and the XCVU095 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XCKU095 (Kintex UltraScale) and XCVU095 (Virtex UltraScale).